Manual, repetitive, and impossible to fully check
Generic CAM tools were never designed for stencil work. Every requirement you write by hand, every revision you explain, and every review you do by eye costs hours. One missed aperture stops the line and delays the shipment.
Requirements take hours to write
Writing stencil requirements by hand means screenshots, callouts and long notes for every odd-form part.
Endless vendor back-and-forth
You spend days on calls and email explaining intent to vendor engineers — and the result still depends on who reads it.
Manual review misses defects
Reviewing thousands of pads by eye is exhausting. On dense boards you can only spot-check, so defects get through.
CAM tools built for another job
CAM350 and GC were built for bare-board fabrication, not SMT apertures. You end up fighting the tool instead of doing the work.















